Message-ID: <22139169.1075859454670.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:13:22 -0800 (PST)
From: ayudkowsky@stroock.com
To: b..sanders@enron.com, jazayeri.peter@enron.com
Subject: Re: CPX - Response to PGE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Alan Yudkowsky" <AYUDKOWSKY@stroock.com>@ENRON
X-To: pgurfein@akingump.com, jcrossen@apx.com, rich.stevens@avistacorp.com, david.burns@bakerbotts.com, amy.lee@bchydro.com, gary.sherlock@bchydro.com, jyoo@bdo.com, khenry@bdo.com, dmbutz@butzdunn.com, doug.anderson@calenergy.com, dag@dgdk.com, rdiamond@dgdk.com, ayudkowsky@earthlink.net, Mellencamp, Lisa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LMELLEN>, Sanders, Richard B. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RSANDER>, aarbisser@kayescholer.com, adanker@kayescholer.com, apalma@kayescholer.com, AWagner@kayescholer.COM, gcaplan@kayescholer.com, kgold@kayescholer.com, marccohen@kayescholer.com, mfranks@kayescholer.com, rleibow@kayescholer.com, steekah@kayescholer.com, tkent@kayescholer.com, vhuntley@kayescholer.com, kjohan@ladwp.com, ceklund@llgm.com, dwhitley@llgm.com, jrnelson@llgm.com, mlubic@mdbe.com, wbates@mdbe.com, jay.wilson@mirant.com, zack.starbird@mirant.com, pmar@mofo.com, hweg@pgwlaw.com, david.facey@powerex.com, doug.little@powerex.com, sgussett@reliant.com, john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com, rbeitler@sempratrading.com, Amy Perlis <APERLIS@stroock.com>, Peter Jazayeri <PJAZAYERI@stroock.com>, featon@whitecase.com, guzzi@whitecase.com, rcamps@whitecase.com, tlauria@whitecase.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Jan2002\Sanders, Richard B.\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsander (Non-Privileged).pst

We believe that a paragraph should be added objecting to the waiver of the Rule 26(a) and (f) requirements respecting "Electric Generation Claims."  Given PG&E's stated intention to object to market participants' claims, PG&E should not be exempted from nor should we be deprived of these mandatory disclosures.  Moreover, PG&E's concession that it will comply if "ordered in connection with particular claim objections" impermissibly puts the burden on market participants to seek an order mandating compliance on a claim-by-claim basis.

Alan Z. Yudkowsky, Esq.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
310-556-5829
310-556-5959 (fax)
ayudkowsky@stroock.com

>>> <adanker@kayescholer.com> 12/19/01 05:35PM >>>
Dear Committee Member,

Attached below is a draft of the response which we intend to file tomorrow
or Friday in the PG&E case with respect to their motion to establish a
procedure for preliminary claims objections.  You are welcome to file
joinders if you wish.

Regards,
Ashleigh.

(See attached file: 23061475.pdf)